Home

Lasagna Dinner
Wed. Oct. 18

No Hike in
Oct or Nov


Landfill & SWMP
Information
Action Alert

Hotel Info
Sally's Recycling
Corner

Subscribe to
SPB List

Action Alerts

Court Cases

Newsletters
by Subject

Newsletters
by Date

Newspaper
Articles

Speakers List

The Karner Blue

Nabokov

Fire!

Virtual Exhibit

Cartoons


About SPB

Volunteer

Our Friends:

FORCE

Historic Action
Network

Friends of
Stanford Home

Protest Photos

Letters to SPB
Join Mailing List


Save the Pine Bush Files
Amicus Brief

by Lynne Jackson
 

On behalf of Save the Pine Bush, Steve Downs, our attorney, filed an amicus brief on the standing issue in the Brunswick Smart Growth appeal. The premise of the lawsuit — that comprehensive planning (when done correctly) — is a better tool to forge environmental policy than is litigation. Therefore anything that can make comprehensive planning unenforceable (such as very restrictive standing requirements under SEQRA), should be eliminated.

The holding of Supreme Court in Brunswick Smart Growth v. Town of Brunswick (July 17, 2009) was that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any environmental injuries “different in kind and degree from that suffered by all other voters, residents, citizens, and taxpayers of the Town of Brunswick” The injuries alleged in the petition were a failure of the Town of Brunswick to update its comprehensive planning as required by law, while approving numerous new construction plans which would increase the size of the Town by some 20% without any significant cumulative impact analysis. This would present a dramatic failure of comprehensive planning.

The Amicus brief was filed to encourage an expansion of standing for SEQRA so cases can be heard based on the merits, and not on overly-restrictive standing rules.

Published in the January/February 2010 Newsletter

This page last modified January 10, 2010
Contact Save the Pine Bush at pinebush@aol.com.